So the other day, Twitter and Facebook banned Trump, which kind of made me a bit upset, because I like Trump, and it seemed not too logical and an overreaction, and possibly even spiteful because of the pressure the government has been putting on Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey. Click here if you’d like to watch an Internet video related to the government hearings that demonstrate the possible source of spitefulness.
I don’t know Zuckerberg personally, however, that ex girlfriend’s stepdad that I’ve mentioned many times, worked with him when Facebook was starting. Until recently, I was oblivious to a lot of stuff. It took me a while to realize that this ex girlfriend’s stepdad didn’t like me. I think it’s because this ex girlfriend’s stepdad was basically hired by Facebook because of me, essentially. Don’t get me wrong, there were some fun times I had with this ex girlfriend’s family, but I wish I hadn’t been so oblivious. So, at the core, I don’t think this ex girlfriend’s stepdad liked that he was basically hired at Facebook because of me, and now that I think about it, people actually implicitly told me this a couple of times. For example, if I recall this correctly, this ex girlfriend’s stepdad wrote on Facebook that he graduated from UC Berkeley. So when I got to know this ex girlfriend’s step dad, I thought he graduated from UC Berkeley. Also, his Facebook also showed that he was from, or live in, the city that I’m from. Initially, I thought, why would anybody write they are from the city that I’m from, which doesn’t have the best reputation. That’s before I realized that the city that I’m from was actually quite well known, and there are even parts of the city in the movie True Crime. So in summary, I guess this ex girlfriend’s stepdad was hired by Facebook for marketing reasons, because he was somehow affiliated with me. (I want to tie-in the term “false identity”(or “identity theft”) because I would also hear that from people, but I also want to continue with the story). I even think I was hired at Google, for a summer internship, for marketing reason, and I’ll write about that in future posts. Oh, and talking about marketing, even here in the Navy, people suggest that I’m some kind of advertiser. So basically, this practice of using me to advertise is nothing new.
With that said, I’ve been wanting to write something for a while, and now seems like the perfect time. I may have mentioned this to someone, but I really don’t think I have; especially with the timing of things. I think the cyberstalkers already know what I want to say and write about because I’ve noted it, digitally, some time ago, so the cyberstalkers are aware, and the cyberstalkers can also see what I see on my digital screens, so they’ve probably seen what I want to show. So when Facebook took the opportunity to ban Trump, the cyberstalkers were almost immediately anticipating me writing this, I can already tell they’ve probably read what I’m going to show; or they could be getting this information from someone else and delivering it to me as a third party.
Anyway, so back in 2018, Zuckerberg went to a senate testimony, and was strangely acting very robotic. I think Zuckerberg is smart, but I don’t think he’s a genius; he’s not a Steve Jobs. He’s a Harvard dropout, trying to emulate the path of Bill Gates. By the way, if you’re not familiar with the Theranos story, you might want to check it out. So I have a friend who I met when I spent a summer in Germany in 2009, and he’s a Yale graduate. I had a conversation with him via Facebook. I believe that Zuckerberg, and other’s from big tech, have been reviewing my messages from social media accounts. It wouldn’t take much for people in big tech, or any kind of tech, to review your account information and “private” messages; everything is stored in a database, all you need is the password, so I guess you really have to trust the organization, and I don’t trust big tech, not any more. Anyway, so I had a conversation with this friend who is a Yale graduate, and here it goes:
- Note that this conversation took place back in 2017. I asked if anyone reached out to him because I felt like he might have given the cyberstalker harassers information to harass me with. While this person is good… better than most, he’s not being entirely upfront with me, but he does hint at a lot of stuff. I wish he would just tell me what’s going on. One thing he said in Germany, in response to an error or misinterpretation he made, was that he was an engineer, not a technician. Which could be an insult, but at the same time, it could be a compliment. And you know how that psychiatrist was saying how one person is a tech and another person is a physician, excessively. I’m convinced the cyberstalker harassers reached out to him, years ago, knowing that I considered him to be one of the smartest people I’ve ever met, to find a way to get something from him to harass me with – to somehow tell me I’m not smart, and to turn more people against me – just the cyberstalkers being haters, and this guy helped them out with the word “technician.”
- Back in 2009, when I met this friend, I was still oblivious about many things, and I went about my life not knowing people knew stuff about me… people knew who I was, before I knew who I was. I’ve mentioned before, when I went to Germany, someone told me “you’re famous” and he was kind of serious, but I thought it was just the language barrier… I’ll talk about this more later, just wanted to mention it.
- In 2017, there was still some stuff I didn’t know about the cyberstalking, but it was well in effect.
- I think he’s calling me a hacker here because there seems to be this misconception that I hacked the education system by graduating from UC Berkeley with an engineering degree. There were some people who supported me, directly and indirectly, and there were some people who didn’t support me, directly and indirectly. There’s one professor in particular that I want to talk about who was supportive of me, but I didn’t realize until many years later. Given what I’ve been through, I don’t think people thought I was going to make it, that far… hence the misconception of me being a hacker or con-artist or whatever; I worked hard! Those who subscribe to this misconception are probably haters and just trying to keep a person down.
- I think he’s implicitly asking what I “plan to do with” my degree. As if to say getting my degree was a waste of time because it’s not like I’ll be able to do anything with it after. Jesus, and I can think of so many times where people implicitly said things to me, and I was so oblivious; including people telling me that getting my degrees were a waste. To some extent, they were a waste. I mean, I had an internship at Google, but that was just for a summer and they were supposed to hire me the next summer, but didn’t, and I’ll write more about that later. After getting my degree in computer science, the cyberstalking was well in effect, and the software industry blatantly kept me out. The engineering and construction industry kind of kept me out… I’d say they limited me, until the cyberstalking allowed the industry to control me. To another extent, it wasn’t a waste at all. There is a reason graduation ceremonies are called “commencements,” which means “to begin.” An education will only get you so far. It was expensive and stressful, but is the best investment I’ve ever made, especially given my situation.
- He might be saying he “doesn’t think it works like that” to probably allude to him telling the cyberstalkers harassers to say “technician”
- He then makes a major typo, which seems to me to be intentional. He might be saying something about me being an at risk youth, and then might be calling me “it” or something. I don’t see how “it” sounds like “youth” and that’s why I’m convinced that was written and sent intentionally to indirectly say something to me. Which reminds me: one of the first times we met up in Germany, we were to met at a subway station. He was late, and I was about to leave. As I was about to leave, I see him running towards me. Then again, that wasn’t the only time he was late… I don’t know… anyway. During my college years though, it did seem like I was part of certain people’s community service project or whatever.
- This guy can be witty, which is one of the reasons I really like him as a friend.
- So I asked if he smiled at the end because, I thought the major typo was intentional, but funny, and I was convinced it was intentional because there was a smiley face, but then he tells me he said “smiley face” and I guess the speech-to-text technology is programmed to add smiley faces… I’m not familiar with the speech-to-text technology.
- Another typo, could be trying to indirectly say something, not too sure.
- He’s not a US citizen, he’s from Europe, and he has an accent, but he speaks very clearly.
- This is where I start to say he spoke like a robot.
- “maybe one day everybody will speak like a robot…” … um, yeah.
- See this is where I essentially tell this guy he’s the smartest person I’ve ever met. So much so, that I would try to speak like him, and it was almost robotic. By the way… remember how Elon Musk was acting like a robot on the Joe Rogan show LOL
So, with this conversation taking place in 2017, and then Zuckerberg’s senate testimony in 2018, and the cyberstalking I’ve been experiencing, I’m convinced this is the reason Zuckerberg was acting out of character, acting robotic, to appear to be very intellectual. This is still speculative, however, if you have any doubts, just know that cyberstalking is not impossible… it’s very possible, and anonymity and glass lighting is the basis of cyberstalking, and although I don’t have direct proof, I do have proof… just review my phone calls with Apple.