D Talks #43

So here’s a brief update on the whole false imprisonment demand letter situation. However, before I start with that, just wanted to mention a spam comment I got on D Talks #42. I’d say ever since mid November 2020, I started to receive spam comments, except, these comments don’t really seem to be “spam,” because spam is usually posted in bulk to more than one place, and these comments definitely seem to be specifically sent to me. So I guess these spam comments are actually comments from the cyber harassers, disguised as spam, for the sake of anonymity. Here’s that comment:

Spam comment, D Talks #42

So there’s that “‘thank you’ for not pursuing legal action” “thank you” and then there’s a “typo” of an exclamation mark typed out as a “1” instead, which pretty much means, justice won’t be served because it’s only me, “1,” and everyone else against me, which doesn’t seem to be so accurate, especially nowadays.

Alright, so regarding the brief update on the whole false imprisonment demand letter situation, I last mentioned that I was going to write the demand letter myself and have a legal professional review the letter. After continued research to prepare to write this letter, I discovered that in my case, a demand letter isn’t even necessary. Sure, I’ll have to write something, however, since false imprisonment is considered a personal injury, and personal injuries are under tort laws, there’s already a system in place for me to file a claim. I still might consult with a legal professional to review the forms I need to send to file a claim, but the forms are all I need, and a letter isn’t necessary. Upon realization of this, was a source of the behavior of others last week, in effort to deter my efforts.