So, I’ve written blogs related to my activity with stocks when writing about a compromised stock broker. Now I have something very recent to write about related to my activity with stocks.
So, my cyberstalkers are still interfering with my everyday life, and this includes my activity with stocks. Lately, I’ve been more active with stocks. The application I’ve been using closed unexpectedly several times the last couple of days, which could be a coincidence, but with the responses I get from these stalkers, it doesn’t seem like it. Anyway, so Friday, I took note of a couple of stocks, and later that day, I checked up on those stocks. I observed something very strange. One of the stocks had quite a few disparities.
Alright, so here’s the stock in question. The price of the stock has changed during after market hours, so I wanted to look at the chart to see the activity. However, I didn’t see a pricing of $504 reflected on the chart.
The last price displayed is $497.56, and there are missing interval prices.
This stock, CCL, has more candles in the grey area, which represents after hours.
So this made me curious, and I don’t like to read into things too much, but with all that’s going on with these cyberstalkers interfering with my everyday life, I decided to probe to see what I could gather, and potentially reveal any sketchiness. I joined an online community a couple of months ago to learn more about stocks and decided to ask if anyone could explain these disparities. I couldn’t formulate a reasonable explanation myself, so I was hoping someone could convince me that there is a reason for these disparities and that these disparities are normal.
Going into the probe, I already had a conspiracy theory to explain these disparities. See, so, I’m only paper trading stocks at the moment. I purchased PFE at a random price of $40.14. I decided to sell PFE because I wanted to focus on other stocks I purchased. So I set a sell price for $40.20. And what’s the price difference between $40.20 and $40.14? … $0.06! or “six cents” which sounds like “sixth sense”!!!
Now why is that relevant? So when I set the sell price, I got a response from my cyberstalkers. I guess they thought I was trying to offend or something… but actually was just trying to learn more about stocks, and I bought a stock, and I wanted to sell a stock, and I wanted to end with a gain, even if it was just a couple of cents, so I rounded up to the closest multiple of ten. However, since these cyberstalkers thought I was trying to offend, they wanted to be vengeful, and wanted to harass me by demonstrating their influence and fixing stock prices… that’s my conspiracy theory, and I could be wrong, I’m still not very sure, either way, the probe was worthwhile. Why was this potentially offensive to the cyberstalkers? Because on Thursday, my department was partaking in a memorial for a fellow coworker. Something tells me this memorial wasn’t legit. Like I’ve mentioned before, there’s this continuous effort by these cyberstalking oppressors to deter me from vlogging, even when the vlog has nothing to do with them. So leading up to the memorial, there were some announcements regarding the time and date, and they made it sound optional, which it should be, right? Anyway, so I already decided that I wasn’t going to attend because, I’d say almost every single person I encounter is a bully, my supervisors and at least some coworkers are speaking with friends and family afar to harass me, these people stalk and harass me continuously to the point where it’s so wide spread and obvious, I’m constantly verbally harassed, I’m being watched in my living space and my supervisors and peers are aware of every single thing I do and report that information to people and entities I interact with directly and indirectly on the internet. What’s more, I actually went to a coworker gathering a couple of weeks ago to make an effort to socialize with coworkers, and I was being bullied. So… Is there a chance this memorial was legit? Sure. Is there a chance this memorial wasn’t legit? Sure, and I’m more sure now, after the memorial that it was not legit. A day or two before the memorial, one of the supervisors says that if anyone didn’t want to attend the memorial, to tell him why; as if to ask permission to not go to a memorial. Which is strange, it’s not he’s dealing with children. So the morning of the memorial, I sent a text message to a group messenger asking about the schedule for those who weren’t going to this memorial, and I got confirmation. Later that morning, during the morning meeting, this supervisor says, despite the confirmation in the group chat, that everyone is “expected” to be at the memorial because no one talked to him about not going. So with all this strangeness, I was more sure this memorial wasn’t legit and it seemed like it was a simulated memorial for my online presence. So I told myself that I wasn’t going to go, I wasn’t going to waste my time. Then about half an hour after the meeting, a supervisor writes to the group chat that everyone is expected to be at the memorial, which just reassured me even more that this memorial wasn’t legit. I didn’t change my mind and I didn’t attend, even though one of the supervisors said they “might” take attendance. I figured if this memorial was legit, which it most likely wasn’t, and mandatory, which it’s not, then they’ll either call me or talk to me the next day. The next day after the morning meeting, I was wanting and waiting for a supervisor to ask me why I didn’t show up, because I was going to be honest and say that the majority of people there are bullies, I’m constantly verbally harassed, and I’d like to keep my distance from them as much as possible. Could things change? Sure. You know what’s funny though? Before the morning meeting ended, they announced that there’s going to be another memorial, in the near future, for another coworker…. Jesus
Alright, so the probe. So, another reason I want to write this blog is because, I’m reviewing my mental notes on what I want to include in the next vlog. One of those notes is related to how I can’t meet anyone new without my cyberstalkers interfering with that interaction, with an effort to turn people against me… and that’s kind of just the norm now, and that’s actually a characteristic sign of human trafficking. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t work. Sometimes it seems like these new people are just complying with these cyberstalkers to avoid any kind of friction. So if I don’t talk about it during the vlogs, I’ll mention it here, and that is, I think the last person I met without the cyberstalkers interfering with that interaction was during Phase 11 of the cyberstalking.
But anyway, so I’m aware that my cyberstalkers close to me, and afar, have already established their covert conduit of communication with this online community I joined, as they do and have done with other people and entities, for years now. And you know what, what I also want to talk about during the vlogs as well is, for some time, I was reluctant to interact with people or entities because I knew my cyberstalkers would interfere. After some thought though, I figured, these cyberstalkers are not going to stop, the spread will help reveal the cyberstalking, so why contain myself… and at the same time, I strangely feel at home where ever I go now; physically and virtually. So I ask the online community about the disparities, and by the responses I got, I could tell my cyberstalkers are speaking through these people in the community. And me writing this is not being vengeful against anyone, it’s just my effort to convey the reality of my situation of being cyberstalked and harassed, and as I told myself several times, anything I’d tell my mom, I’d tell the internet, because I don’t have a mom and I have no close overt unconditional support, and me telling the internet is how I gain support. Oh yeah, another thing I wanted to point out is, for those who make the effort to bully me, if you have good parents, what the heck are you doing messing with me? What’s worse, what the heck are you doing helping my parents mess with me? I’ve seen the cyberstalking culture bring out the racist child abuser in many many people…
Anyway, so the first response I got didn’t really make much sense to me; this person writes to ignore the after market pricing, for some reason, and that the price can spike either way. It didn’t seem like a reasonable explanation to me. I think to myself, why would you ignore after market pricing if the change is reflected in the gain and loss numbers? I could be mistaken, I’m still learning, but there just seems to be too many disparities, which leads me to my supplemental conspiracy theory. So, I gotta say, the federal government has been my best employer, and it’s not because I have the best coworkers or supervisors, it’s because of the instructions that prescribe policies and procedures to follow. There are so many instructions, and it’s all public information. If I have a question regarding how something should be handled, there’s probably some kind of document written already. Recently I had a question, and the answer I received was more of a guess with no reference to any document. So I decided to read the instructions and was able to find the answer to my question, and I had a better understanding of the procedures overall. The next day, I spoke with the same person, and with the correct terms, was able to clarify my question, and clarify the answer. One of the terms was “disparities” and the policy and procedure was regarding disparities. So with these disparities in the stock pricing and all, my conspiracy theory is that the cyberstalkers may have influenced these stock price disparities, to be spiteful I guess, or to get some attention at my expense, which is not ok with me, just like this cyberstalking is not ok with me. Again, I could be wrong, this is just a conspiracy theory.
Anyway, so I reply saying that after market pricing doesn’t seem to be something to ignore, and I also jokingly say that I have a conspiracy theory, given the cyberstalking. Then another person replies by telling me to tell the conspiracy theory, and I reply saying that I already got started on drafting a blog about it. Then a third person replies talking about the platform being used, and it seemed as though this person might have been trying to call me dumb, since, for a couple of days, I was politely asking this person who watches me in my living space, “why are you so dumb?” Like, how dare I verbally defend myself against a criminal peeping tom who constantly verbally harasses me! I stayed logical and replied with reason. This person was basically saying that the platform I was trading stocks with, was better than another platform, but was writing as though I was trading stocks with that other platform, even though it was somewhat clear which platform I was trading stocks with. The community collectively trades with the other platform, but I’m still getting familiar with the user interface of the other platform, and weaning off the platform in question. So I reply saying that the “better” platform is showing missing candles, and ask what his display of the platform is showing; this person hasn’t replied yet, so my guess is this person wasn’t being sincere.
When I started drafting this blog is when I noticed that there were missing candles. Could that explain the disparities? I hope so, because I’d rather have these disparities be a coincidence than for them to be cyber harassment on behalf of… I don’t know… either the platform, or one of the largest stock markets in the world… You know what, it seemed like the FB stock oddly increased in value after Zuckerburg spoke to congress, I guess to cheer him up. Now these stock prices seem to be manipulated to harass me… you see, this cyberstalking brings out the racist child abuser out of a lot of people LOL. Anyway, so I ask regarding the missing candles. Someone replies saying that if there are no trades there are no candles. Which makes some sense, but then this person wrote not to “read too much into it,” which seems insincere for a couple of reasons. Yeah, I’m reading into this, I try not too, I try to ignore it as much as I can, until there is some obviousness; it’s the nature of the gaslighting. With this probe, I think I’m happy with my gathering… I’m at 2000+ words for this blog so far. This seems insincere because, this phrase, “reading too much into” something, doesn’t seem to apply to this situation directly, only implicitly, and even sounds like a gaslighter. Why would I not read into these disparities? There must be a reason for this disparities. Yeah, I have a conspiracy theory, and for someone being cyberstalked and harassed, it does seem likely. I would be convinced this person was being sincere if they didn’t write this phrase. That phrase applies to this situation implicitly, by acknowledging the harassment, and could also be teasing because they sent that message at 2:48PM, which translates to me being watch 24 hours because pedophile. Or this person could be legit, sincere with sound character, implicitly telling me, yeah man, these people are messing with you. But like I mentioned, I stay logical, and don’t play into the implicitness too much, and just kill with kindness, just in case this person is actually being sincere. I replied saying this person’s reasoning makes some sense, but I still sense some sketchiness, so I was going to continue with this blog on my conspiracy theory…
Then the first person replies to that last comment with something, vague. This person is from a country where people are culturally nicer I guess. See, like I’ve mentioned, I used to be a really nice person, and never played into passive aggressive bullying behavior, so I know what it’s like. I’d prefer to not deal with passive aggressive behavior. I’d rather be around people who are genuinely nice people who respect each other and don’t attack each other, or people who don’t feel like they need to be so defensive. I’ve been around people who just bully me because they don’t want to be bullied, and that’s something I’m proud to say I never played into, and I think it’s because I can defend myself physically, and now I can defend myself verbally. Anyway, I could be wrong, but it seems like this person is being told what to say by my cyberstalkers to verbally harass me. By the way, as far as verbal defense goes, the cyberstalkers who know I didn’t know how to verbally defend myself and would verbally bully me, do not want to go toe to toe with me verbally now LOL. Actually, you know, I’ve been wanting to write a “how to” blog on how to verbally defend yourself while not being a bully. Anyway, so this person wrote that afterhours are not “with” the headache. That “with” seems like an intentional typo, and an allusion to when my high school friends would make fun of my mother being raped. Then “headache” would be my father alluding to my grandfather, who is his father, who actually wanted my father to go to prison by the way.
Anyway, that’s what it seems like… and I could be wrong, and I could be reading into this too much… or not.
Respectfully.